|
||||||||
Daily Notebook
This web site is protected by copyright law.
Reusing pictures or text requires permission from the author. |
|
2026 March 15 |
Zooming in on the Christmas Tree Cluster For the first time in what seems like years (actually months), we have a warm, clear nights on March 12 and 14, and I used two astrophotographic "rigs" at once. One project was to get an ultra-portable setup ready to take into the country to hunt integrated flux nebulosity. That consists of a camera tripod, an iOptron SkyTracker that I've had for more than a decade, and a camera and lens that I've also had for more than a decade (Canon 60Da), and a couple of lenses that are also getting on in years. New image processing software (BlurXTerminator) squeezes a bit more quality out of almost any camera lens by cleaning up residual optical imperfections near the corners, as well as minor tracking inaccuracies, and PixInsight can now reject poorly tracked frames automatically. The first lens I tried was my vintage-1970 Nikon 50-mm f/2. Here's a wide-field view of Monoceros, from the Rosette Nebula at the bottom up to a snake-like dark nebula at the top, a stack of 92 (yes, 92) 30-second exposures at ISO 800 and f/2.8. This is not the full frame but is almost the whole left half of the picture, and as you can see, with modern processing the image is sharp indeed. Since this was taken in town, it doesn't show any particularly hard-to-get objects.
Left of center is a star cluster (NGC 2422) that looks like an upside-down Christmas tree, and that brings me to last night's (March 14) photo session. I moved up to my Sigma 105/2.8 DG EX lens, vintage 2005, nowadays assisted by a black rubber band to keep its focuser from rotating under the force of gravity or vibration, since it has loosened up a bit with age. At f/2.8 it is as sharp as we could wish, and the tracking is good. Here's the field of the Christmas Tree cluster: | |
| ||
|
This is a stack of 40 1-minute exposures at ISO 800, f/2.8. Again this is not the whole frame, but almost all of the left half. Meanwhile, I had the Celestron 8 EdgeHD going on the Losmandy mount, using the f/7 reducer and Altair 26C camera. I was using a new guidescope arrangement that wasn't as sturdy as I hoped, so only about two thirds of the exposures were successful, but that was enough for me to get well over a hundred for each objects. Here, then, is a stack of 120 30-second exposures of the Christmas Tree Cluster, showing the whitish dust (reflection nebulosity) that helps fill out the tree:
Galaxies and an asteroid
Using the same setup I took many exposures of some galaxies in Leo and stacked 120 of them. Right to left, the bright galaxies are M105, NGC 3384, and NGC 3389. The first two are elliptical, and the third is a flocculent (dappled-looking) spiral. There's more. Down toward the lower left, you can see a faint galaxy near the edge of the picture, and then an even fainter one to its right. Those are LEDA 1210457 (magnitude 16) and LEDA 359005 (magnitude 17), two of the many remote galaxies visible in that direction. And there's still more. The brightest galaxy, M105, seems to have a thin streak coming out of it to the left. That turns out to be the 17th-magnitude asteroid 1999 XR36, which was moving in its orbit (a straight line as seen from here). Its track has a gap in it because there was a pause in my series of exposures. There! That was a lot of astrophotography! It starts to make up for some of the time lost while we had bad weather, and then I had cataracts, and cataract surgery, not to mention other things taking up my time. |
||
|
2026 March 5 |
Jupiter, done properly
This evening (March 5) I used the 8-inch telescope to photograph Jupiter properly (without the f/7 reducer, and with a camera with smaller pixels). This is a stack of the best 25% of 9,105 video frames with a ToupTek 678 color camera. I also had my first visual astronomy session, brief though it was, since both eyes fully recovered from cataract surgery and the blurry spots that troubled me for a few weeks. An ophthalmologist with whom I correspond about astronomy has suggested that they were stray particles left over from removing the old lens, and adhering to the posterior capsule or something near it, and they dissolved. We may never know, but they're gone. I can truthfully describe the implanted lenses as better than new. There are no unwelcome optical effects when I look through the eyepiece, and even at 400×, which is almost too high a power for this telescope, I get a much smoother view than even 20 years ago; the artificial lens doesn't have the specks and spots that were always inherent in the natural one. |
|
|
2026 March 4 |
Dual-booting Linux with Windows 11 On my do-everything 14-inch ThinkPad, which I take to the library and everywhere else I do work, I needed to actually run Linux, not just WSL. So I set it up to dual-boot. Lots of web pages tell you how to do this; where I will mention some unobvious details. It's not quite the same as dual-booting Windows 10 with Linux. Most things are the same, but what has changed is that under Windows 11, BitLocker disk encryption is more or less compulsory. You can turn it off, but Windows updates are liable to turn it on again. And I want to have it in place, so that if someone steals my laptop or obtains the flash drive from it, they won't be able to read my data. My first attempt was a disaster — Linux was happy as a clam (or penguin), GRUB worked so that I could choose operating systems when booting, but Windows asked for the BitLocker recovery key every time it booted. Fortunately I had my key available (I had to go home to get it), but that wasn't acceptable. What was wrong?! I searched online for answers and ended up completely undoing the Linux installation — deleting the partition it was installed on, using bootsect to fix Windows (subtle; it involved mounting the boot sector as drive S), and even hiding "ubuntu" in the UEFI boot menu. Well, toward the end of that process I found out what was wrong. Windows demands the BitLocker key if Secure Boot is turned off in BIOS (UEFI). The problem may not have been Linux at all! But installing Linux with the wrong options can apparently cause Secure Boot to turn off, and wiping out every last trace of Linux doesn't fix it. So the second time, I did everything right:
That gave me a successful Linux installation, with GRUB for choosing operating systems. There were three remaining concerns. Time zones: If Windows sets the system clock automatically (as mine does), Linux has to be told to run on local time rather than UT (GMT), or it will reset the system clock several hours off. Nowadays all you need is the command: sudo timedatectl set-local-rtc 1 File sharing: Linux can't see a BitLocker-protected disk, and I think I like it that way. (A stranger with Linux on a jump drive wouldn't be able to read my data either.) Fortunately, my ThinkPad T490s has a strange provision for keeping a micro SD card installed more or less permanently, though it's easy to get out, much like changing a SIM card in a phone. I have a 256-GB card there, and both Linux and Windows can see it and write on it. That's how I get files back and forth from one OS to the other. I did not opt for Linux disk encryption, so I will limit the amount of confidential data that I store in Linux. If this becomes a concern, I can presumably turn disk encryption on. Mouse: You can't pair a Bluetooth mouse with more than one operating system; don't try. Also, a recent-model Logitech mouse that supports both Bluetooth and USB wireless turns out to have a complicated pairing process that I never got working as desired. (Hint about Logitech mice: A full reset requires taking the battery out! It retains some memory about pairing when switched off.) What worked was to get the old, simple, plain-USB-wireless mouse (Logitech M310) from one of my other computers. It emulates a wired mouse and has no pairing protocol. The one spooky thing about the M310, which other Linux users have noted, is that sometimes the mouse wheel doesn't work under Linux unless you take the battery out for a moment and put it back in. Strange error in some Linux driver, I suppose, perhaps to be fixed in the future. So that's how I spent a lot of time for two afternoons! |
|
|
2026 March 1 |
Some astrophotography at last Due to a remarkable spell of bad weather, I did no astrophotography at all in January, and only finally got around to doing some on the last day of February. My main goal was to test guiding software and a guidescope (I'm trying out an unofficial fork of PHD2). I had the Celestron 8 EdgeHD set up with the f/7 compressor and Altair 26C (24-megapixel) camera, but the gibbous moon was in the sky, so the first thing I did was take a picture of the moon. To be precise, I recorded 99 video frames, then stacked the best 75% (presumably 74 of them) and turned up the color saturation to bring out differences in the minerals on different parts of the moon's surface. Here's the result. | |
| ||
|
It came out admirably sharp. I also have a higher-resolution version. Moon: Aristarchus Here is the region of the lunar crater Aristarchus (a crater with a spooky reputation, and possibly a history of outgassing, raising dust). This is taken the same way, but not scaled down; this is full resolution. Stack of the best 50% of 2000 video frames.
Moon: Mare Crisium
Favorable libration (an effect of non-circular orbits) enabled me to see past Mare Crisium all the way to Mare Smythii, the dark spot right on the edge of the visible moon. This picture is rendered in black-and-white (grayscale) because parts of it were slightly overexposed and did not go through color correction correctly. Stack of the best 50% of 1008 video frames. Jupiter Although definitely not using the right optical configuration or camera, I decided to see what my f/7 deep sky setup would get when I aimed it at Jupiter. Not nearly as much detail as when I use the planetary camera at f/10, but definitely something.
Satellite IV (Callisto) is visible; I brightened it up separately, since it is much darker than the face of Jupiter. By the way, I've decided to join the ranks of the astronomers (many, since the time of Galileo) who call the first four satellites I, II, III, and IV, as Galileo initially did, rather than Io, Europa, Ganymede, and Callisto, the names proposed by Marius and Kepler but not widely used until the twentieth century. If you want to know the reason, look up the mythology, and how Jupiter (Zeus) acquired those four companions. Zeus is not an example of behavior to be emulated. Although nobody ever talked about it, I suspect this may be why generations of earlier astronomers were not particularly fond of that set of names. M78 and NGC 2071
Finally, an actual deep-sky image. Because of the bright moonlight, this is not a great picture, but it proves that the equipment worked. Stack of 150 30-second exposures. These are two reflection nebulae, clouds of dust that reflect the light of nearby stars. M78 is the larger one. |
||
|
|
||
|
This is a private web page,
not hosted or sponsored by the University of Georgia. Portrait at top of page by Sharon Covington. This web site has never collected personal information and is not affected by GDPR. Google Ads may use cookies to manage the rotation of ads, but those cookies are not made available to Covington Innovations. No personal information is collected or stored by Covington Innovations, and never has been. This web site is based and served entirely in the United States.
In compliance with U.S. FTC guidelines,
I am glad to point out that unless explicitly
indicated, I do not receive substantial payments, free merchandise, or other remuneration
for reviewing or mentioning products on this web site.
Any remuneration valued at more than about $10 will always be mentioned here,
and in any case my writing about products and dealers is always truthful.
|
||